Go to
BECOMING HUMAN Click on
interactive timeline. Click on 5 different hominids. Get a picture and a general
description of each. Where was it found? How old is it? What did it look
like?
Write one paragraph summarizing how the hominids changed from oldest to
newest
1)
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
| Found: 2001, in Toros-Manalla site 266, Chad
Old: 7 to 6 million years
info.: The fossil specimen that was found by Brunet’s team was a badly crushed and distorted cranium.
2) Ardipithecus kadaba
Found:1997
Old: 5.7 to 5.2 million years
Info.: Ardipithecus kadabba is an early hominin species recovered from sediments in the Middle Awash Valley of Ethiopia dated to between 5.2 and 5.8 million years ago. These fossils are of particular importance because fragments from both the skull and body have been found and are argued to demonstrate some of the earliest signs of bipedalism and hominin dental morphology. As one of the oldest species of human ancestors, Ar. kadabba helps to push back the origin of hominins into the late Miocene Epoch (roughly 11.6 to 5.3 million years ago).
3) Australopithecus afarensis
Found: November 1974, Hadar, Ethiopia and other sites in Ethiopoia, Kenya, Tanzania
Old: 3.9 tp 3.9 million years
Info. : The first specimens attributed to Australopithecus afarensis were discovered in the 1970’s by Donald Johanson working in the Afar Triangle of Ethiopia at the site of Hadar. A succession of spectacular discoveries, including a knee joint, the famous Lucy skeleton, and the remains of a family group, ensured that Au, afarensis would come to occupy a prominent place on the hominin family tree. In addition to the impressive finds located by Johanson and his international team of scientists, further amazing discoveries were uncovered by Mary Leakey and her team, four years later and far to the south of Ethiopia, at the site of Laetoli, on the edge of the Serengeti Plains in Tanzania. Leakey’s team discovered trace fossils of footprints of hundreds of animals, preserved in an ash layer that was securely dated to 3.6 ma. Amongst the animal footprints were some 70 footprints of hominins, captured as they walked bipedally across a wet, muddy plain. |
| |
4) Australopithecus africanus
Found: October 1924, Taung also Sterkfontein and Makapansgat, South Africa
Old: 3.0 to 2.0 million years old
Info.: The first member of its genus to be discovered, Australopithecus africanus is the oldest species of hominin to be found in southern Africa. Cave sites where it is found have been dated approximately to 3-2.0 ma based mostly on biochronological methods (dating methods utilizing the relative chronologies of non-hominin animal fossils). Its morphology is similar to Australopithecus afarensis, but it has important differences in the skull and teeth. The fact that Au. africanus shares some morphological features with Au. afarensis, others with members of the Paranthropus genus, and others with early Homo species makes it a difficult species to place in the hominin lineage. Thus, understanding Au. africanus is central to understanding early hominin phylogeny. |

5)
Homo heidelbergensis
Found: October 1907, Mauer, Germany also Europe generally, Africa, Asia
Old: 800-350 thousand years
Info.: Fossils assigned to Homo heidelbergensis (named for a mandible found near Heidelberg, Germany) are found throughout the Old World from tropical to temperate zones at sites dating to the Middle Pleistocene dated (Approximately) between 800,000 and 125,000 years ago. These sites include Bodo and Kabwe in Africa, Petralona, Arago and Sima de los Huesos in Europe, Dali and Jinnishuan in Asia. H. heidelbergensis displays traits that are primitive (traits shared with its ancestor, in this case, Homo erectus); however, it also possesses many derived traits (traits different from those found in the ancestral species, in this case, traits that are more similar to those found in Homo sapiens). There is evidence H. heidelbergensis made fairly sophisticated stone tools and hunted large animals, suggesting an advanced ability to engage in cooperative social activities. Because the size of the sample of H. heidelbergensis fossils is small and many fossils have not been precisely dated, the relationships between this species and those that came before and after (as well as the cohesiveness of the species itself) is the source of substantial debate among scientists. Paleoanthropologists often refer to the uncertainties surrounding the specimens, their dating and morphology, as “the muddle in the middle.”